Donald Trump weakens IRS ban on pulpit endorsements

View Caption Hide Caption
President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Rose Garden of the of the White House in Washington on Thursday, asking the IRS to use "maximum enforcement discretion" over the regulation, known as Johnson Amendment, which applies to churches and nonprofits AP/Evan Vucci

In a Rose Garden ceremony, President Donald Trump on Thursday signed a long-promised executive order intended to weaken enforcement of an IRS rule barring churches and tax-exempt groups from endorsing political candidates.

“No one should be censoring sermons or targeting pastors,” Trump said to many of the evangelical leaders who supported him during his 2016 campaign. “We are giving our churches their voices back.”

Alveda King, a niece of Martin Luther King Jr., who had endorsed Trump, received one of the pens Trump used to sign the order. Tom Price and Sonny Perdue, now members of Trump’s cabinet, were also in the audience.

Critics of the action say removal of the so-called Johnson Amendment, which since 1954 has barred political endorsements by many tax-exempt organizations, will turn churches and other religious institutions into more vehicles for hidden campaign money.

***

Churches and the IRS: The Johnson Amendment explained

Twitter explodes over Donald Trump’s religious liberty order

***

With his order, Trump disappointed some conservative Christian supporters who wanted his executive action to include protections for businesses that refuse to do business, for religious reasons, with certain categories of people  – including same-sex couples.

But as governor of Indiana two years ago, Vice President Mike Pence signed legislation offering such protections to businesses. In his introduction of Trump this morning, Pence made no mention of the omission.

Trump nearly overshadowed his own White House event with an announcement that he would soon go to Saudi Arabia to meet with leaders of Muslim nations, then to Israel and Rome. From the Associated Press:

The order also promises “regulatory relief” for groups with religious objections to the preventive services requirement in the Affordable Care Act, according to a White House official. Those requirements include covering birth control and could apply to religious groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor, who have moral objections to paying for contraception.

 

The White House did not release the full text of the order, and it was not clear just how the pledges would be carried out. The order, which essentially would make it even less likely that a religious organization would lose its tax-exempt status because of a political endorsement, falls short of what religious conservatives expected from Trump, who won overwhelming support from evangelicals by promising to “protect Christianity” and religious freedom…

 

Ralph Reed, a longtime evangelical leader and founder of the Faith & Freedom Coalition, said he was briefed by White House officials about the text of the executive order. Reed called the provisions an excellent “first step” in the Trump administration’s plans for protecting religious freedom

 

Reed said he was “thrilled” by the language on the IRS restrictions on partisan political activity. “This administratively removes the threat of harassment,” Reed said in a phone interview. “That is a really big deal.” He said the language in the order related to the preventive care mandate will “ensure that as long as Donald Trump is president, that something like the Little Sisters of the Poor case will never happen again.”

 

But Gregory Baylor, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative Christian legal group that advocates for broad conscience protections, said the summary of the executive order released late Wednesday leaves Trump’s campaign promises to people of faith unfulfilled. Baylor said directing the IRS not to enforce limits on political speech, while leaving the restrictions in place, still gives too much discretion to IRS agents. And Baylor called the promised “regulatory relief” from the birth control coverage requirement “disappointingly vague.”

 

Mark Silk, a professor at Trinity College in Connecticut who writes on religious freedom, called the actions described by the White House “very weak tea,” especially compared to the draft religious freedom executive order that was leaked earlier this year, That document contained sweeping provisions on conscience protection for faith-based ministries, schools and federal workers across an array of agencies. “It’s gestural as far as I can tell,” Silk said.

 

Trump promised to “totally destroy” the law prohibiting the political activities, known as the Johnson Amendment, when he spoke in February at the National Prayer Breakfast, a high-profile Washington event with faith leaders, politicians and dignitaries. Fully abolishing the regulation would take an act of Congress, but Trump can direct the IRS not to enforce the prohibitions.

 

The White House official, who was not authorized to discuss the issue publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity, told reporters Wednesday night that the order will direct the IRS to use “maximum enforcement discretion” over the rule. The official insisted on anonymity despite criticism from president himself of the media’s use of anonymous sources.

 

The regulation, named for then-Sen. Lyndon Johnson, was put into force in 1954 and prohibited partisan political activity for churches and other tax-exempt organizations. The policy still allows a wide range of advocacy on political issues, but in the case of houses of worship, it bars electioneering and outright political endorsements from the pulpit. The rule has rarely been enforced.

 

The IRS does not make public its investigations in such cases, but only one church is known to have lost its tax-exempt status as a result of the prohibition. The Church at Pierce Creek in Conklin, New York, was penalized for taking out newspaper ads telling Christians they could not vote for Bill Clinton in the 1992 presidential election. Even so, some religious leaders have argued the rule has a chilling effect on free speech, and have advocated for years for repeal.

 

While Trump’s action on the Johnson Amendment aims to please religious conservatives, some oppose any action that would weaken the policy.

 

In a February survey of evangelical leaders conducted by the National Association of Evangelicals, which represents churches from about 40 denominations, 89 percent said pastors should not endorse political candidates from the pulpit. Nearly 100 clergy and faith leaders from across a range of denominations sent a letter last month to congressional leaders urging them to uphold the regulation. They said the IRS rule protects houses of worship and religious groups from political pressure.

 

Easing political activity rules for churches also raises questions about whether churches could be pulled into the campaign finance sphere and effectively become “dark money” committees that play partisan politics without disclosing donors.

 

The order’s health care provision could apply to groups like the Little Sisters of the Poor, who run more than two dozen nursing homes for impoverished seniors, and have moral objections to paying the birth control costs of women in their health plans. The Obama administration created a buffer meant to shield those groups, but they said it didn’t go far enough. They continued to press their case in the courts. Last year, the Supreme Court asked lower courts to take another look at the issue.


View Comments 2