DeKalb County CEO Burrell Ellis, one of metro Atlanta’s most powerful leaders, finally told jurors and the public his side of the story Wednesday, testifying in his corruption trial that he never retaliated against county contractors who refused to give campaign contributions.
It happened in 2012. Georgia won the SEC East and played Alabama for the conference title. Georgia Tech tied Miami and North Carolina for first in the ACC Coastal but, since the Tar Heels were ineligible and the Hurricanes chose in late November to remove themselves from postseason play, the Yellow Jackets advanced to meet Florida State in the league championship game.
See Flashback Fotos on myajc.com for only 99 cents. Visit the MyAJC archives for a historic look at Atlanta from Midtown in the 70s to Auburn Avenue and even life here before traffic jams on the interstates.
Far more provocative were Reed’s comments on surveillance and the future city of Atlanta – the contest between public safety and privacy. Listen to the exchange here:
Below is a rough transcript:
Reed: “I’m putting it on the table to have a conversation. I mean, Bill, I don’t want to scare you, but between now and 2050, if you live in a major metro….between the cameras that we will install and between your mobile phone… we would be able to put eyes on you…for about 80 percent of the time you were moving around.”
Nigut: “You say ‘we.’”
Reed: “I mean the government. And it would have to be a choice. But if you were a single person, whether man or a woman, and when you left your house, you wanted eyes on you, and you agreed to that, and you enabled us to track your phone, between our cameras and our surveillance capability, in the future, we’ll be able to know where you are 80 to 85 percent of the time.
“That has significant public safety ramifications. But it also has very serious privacy ramifications….”
Nigut: “By then you’ll be in the private sector. Are you comfortable with the fact that government will be able to track you as an individual?”
Reed: “I’m not comfortable with it if I don’t give approval for it. But I am aware that, in terms of the camera capability, I don’t believe that we’re going to be able to put that genie back in a bottle. I think that because of the risks that are associated with terrorism, an increasingly fragile international community, that we will not be able to put the surveillance capabilities back in the bottle.”